Skip to main content

03 / Colorectal Surgery · open

Hartmann's procedure

Resection of the diseased sigmoid with an end colostomy and a closed rectal stump: the operation for the perforated, obstructed or unstable left colon where an anastomosis would be a gamble.

Indication: Perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, obstructing sigmoid cancer in an unstable patient, and sigmoid volvulus with compromised bowel.

Part of Colorectal Surgery →4 stages4 complications to knowopen

Read the imaging first

Operative photo
Intraoperative photograph of a sigmoid colon cancer
Operative view · sigmoid colon cancer at laparotomy

On the tray for this operation

Test yourself on the tray

Stage

1 / 4

Laparotomy and assessment

Midline laparotomy, washout of contamination, and an honest assessment: the state of the sigmoid, the degree of peritonitis, and the physiology on the anaesthetist's screen.

Watch for: Missed second perforation · Underestimated contamination

Why are we operating?

Hartmann's procedure resects the diseased sigmoid and deliberately does not restore continuity: the rectal stump is closed, the colon comes out as an end colostomy, and the join that would have leaked in a contaminated abdomen is never made. It is the operation of purulent and faeculent peritonitis, of obstruction in the unstable, and of the principle that continuity is a luxury bought with physiology.

Pulls toward surgery

Perforated diverticulitis with peritonitisObstructing sigmoid cancer in the unstableContaminated fields forbidding a joinPhysiology that cannot fund an anastomosis

Gives the team pause

The stable patient who could have a defended primary joinReversal realism: a third are never reversedStoma siting forgotten in the emergency

Shared foundations

What the surgeon is thinking

  • Laparotomy and assessment

    What is being decided during the first look?

    The contamination's grade and the patient's reserve, because together they choose between Hartmann's, a defended join, and damage control: the operation's name is picked here, not in the theatre listing. Purulent versus faeculent peritonitis and the pressor requirement are the vocabulary of that decision.

  • Sigmoid resection

    Why resect rather than simply wash and drain?

    The perforated segment is the source, and source control is the operation's entire curative content: washing around a hole in the colon treats the symptom of contamination while the cause keeps publishing. The resection follows the same mesenteric logic as any sigmoid colectomy, abbreviated by urgency.

  • The rectal stump

    What does the rectal stump need, and why is it a named step?

    Secure closure and a recorded length: the stump's blow-out is a real early complication, and its identification is the hardest part of the eventual reversal. Some surgeons tag it with long sutures as a letter to the future operator, which is exactly the right way to think about it.

  • End colostomy

    What makes a good end colostomy in an emergency?

    Site, spout and supply: through the rectus at a site the patient can see and seal (marked pre-operatively whenever the emergency allowed), without tension, and pink at the mucosa. The stoma is the patient's daily experience of this operation for months or forever; five extra minutes here outvalue most other refinements.

Decision points

  • This patient has stabilised beautifully on the table. Convert the plan to resection with primary anastomosis?

    • Stay with Hartmann's

      Faeculent contamination, immunosuppression or shaky physiology: the no-join decision stands even when the numbers flatter.

    • Primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma

      For genuine stability and limited contamination: spares the Hartmann's-reversal mountain, accepts a defended leak risk.

    The intraoperative improvement is partly the resuscitation talking: the decision reads the whole story, including what the physiology looked like an hour ago. Both plans are defensible; drifting between them without a reason is not.

  • Months later: reverse the Hartmann's or leave it?

    • Reversal

      A real operation with its own leak and complication rates, into a pelvis that remembers the peritonitis: for the fit and motivated.

    • Leave the colostomy

      For the frail, the comorbid, or the content: a permanent stoma managed well is a legitimate outcome, not a failure.

    About a third of Hartmann's stomas prove permanent, and the honest version of that statistic belongs in the first consent conversation: 'temporary' is a hope with a denominator, not a promise.

Leaving the OR

The handoff

Procedure
Hartmann's procedure for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, purulent peritonitis
Stump
Stapled, oversewn, tagged; length recorded in the note
Stoma
End colostomy, left iliac fossa, spouted and pink
Physiology
Lactate falling, low-dose noradrenaline, washout completed
Watch for
Stoma viability first 48h, pressor trajectory, day 5 collection window

A fictional educational patient, handed over the way real ones are.

The postoperative course

  1. POD 0-1ICU trajectory watching: the operation's success is read in lactate and pressors, and the stoma checked with a light, not a glance.
  2. POD 2-4Stoma starts working; the teaching starts with it, since the patient goes home only when the bag holds no fear.
  3. POD 5-7The collection window in a washed but once-contaminated abdomen: swinging fever means CT and usually a drain.
  4. MonthsThe reversal conversation, held honestly against fitness and desire; colonoscopy of the remaining colon completes the cancer-exclusion housekeeping where diverticulitis was the diagnosis.

Watch it done

Find Hartmann's procedure videos on YouTube

What can go wrong

OR Prep this operationReview the instruments